<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MacAnalysts | Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seriouslymac.com/tag/analysts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seriouslymac.com</link>
	<description>real-time discovery by s.erious.ly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.seriouslymac.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='www.seriouslymac.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Video: Grading the Apple analysts on a scale of A to F</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q5ndQ9e7tJE/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q5ndQ9e7tJE/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asymco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Dediu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=80268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two ways of seeing how well (or badly) the pros and amateurs predict Apple's earnings</p>
<p>Green = Amateurs, Yellow = Pros Source: Dediu, PED</p>
<p>We've been trying for several years to find the best way to show how much better the so-called amateur analysts (some of whom have since gone pro) are at estimating Apple's (AAPL) quarterly revenue and earnings than the Wall Street professionals who do it for the big <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/06/grading-the-apple-analysts/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=80268&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/06/grading-the-apple-analysts/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street raises its Apple estimates, but not high enough</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/8nm0rUck9gs/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/8nm0rUck9gs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asymco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Dediu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=79659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple's earnings grew 116% in Q1. So why is the Street is looking for 44% in Q2?</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Source: Asymco.com</p>
<p>After Apple (AAPL) blew past everybody's expectations on Tuesday, reporting sales up more than 73% and earnings up nearly 116%, analysts up and down Wall Street rushed to revise their spreadsheets and issue new notes to clients. We got our hands on 39 of them -- plus a note <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/28/wall-street-raises-its-apple-estimates-but-not-high-enough/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=79659&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/28/wall-street-raises-its-apple-estimates-but-not-high-enough/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Apple still deliver an earnings surprise?</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/T-R72FqbOVQ/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/T-R72FqbOVQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=78565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 18% gap between the Street's estimates and the independents' suggests that it can</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Data: Company reports, Apple 2.0</p>
<p>Last fall, a Wall Street analyst who shall remain nameless suggested in a note to clients that the days of the big Apple (AAPL) earnings surprises may be over.</p>
<p>He was referring to the string of quarterly reports in which the company beat the Street's estimates by measures so wide <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/22/can-apple-still-deliver-an-earnings-surprise/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=78565&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/22/can-apple-still-deliver-an-earnings-surprise/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The first 5-million Mac quarter?</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/YoTtq__e2m8/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/YoTtq__e2m8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunebrainstormtech.wordpress.com/?p=78293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>33 of 46 analysts expect Apple to meet or beat that mark in its quarterly report next week</p>
<p>Click to enlarge.</p>
<p>One of the big computer news stories last quarter was the continued strength of Apple's (AAPL) Mac sales even as the rest of the PC industry was shrinking. (See Mac sales zigged as Windows PC sales sagged in Q4.)</p>
<p>How well did the Mac do? We put the question to our two <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/18/the-first-5-million-mac-quarter/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=78293&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/18/the-first-5-million-mac-quarter/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad sales estimates for Q1 range from 11.7 to 19.5 million</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/okyL_u4Czyo/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/okyL_u4Czyo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=78022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Street's consensus: 13.5 million. The indies are 10% more bullish</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Source: Company reports; Apple 2.0</p>
<p>Everybody we've heard from expects Apple (AAPL) to report record iPad sales for the quarter that ended Dec. 31.</p>
<p>And why not? Tablets were a popular gift item this past holiday season. The iPad 2 didn't face much competition -- except perhaps from Amazon's (AMZN) Kindle Fire. And although there were rumors of <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/14/ipad-sales-estimates-for-q1-range-from-11-7-to-19-5-million/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=78022&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/14/ipad-sales-estimates-for-q1-range-from-11-7-to-19-5-million/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many iPhones did Apple sell last quarter?</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/DdKSvEkANT8/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/DdKSvEkANT8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 4s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=77571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pros and amateurs both expect a blow-out. They're just haggling over the percentage</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Source: Company reports; Apple 2.0</p>
<p>The most important metric  for Apple (AAPL) in the quarter that ended eight days ago -- likely to account for more than half of the company's revenue for fiscal Q1 2012 -- is the number of iPhones it sold from Sep. 25 to Dec. 31.</p>
<p>We've polled nearly 40 Apple analysts -- <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/08/how-many-iphones-did-apple-sell-last-quarter-4/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=77571&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/08/how-many-iphones-did-apple-sell-last-quarter-4/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s big miss: The analysts weigh in</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q1Gp5DNL2PQ/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q1Gp5DNL2PQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 4s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=71852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They're calling it a "small hiccup," "black swan," "iBlip"and a "breather at altitude"</p>
<p>Apple's (AAPL) fourth quarter results were the first since 2002 that failed to beat the expectations of the analysts. A sampling of what they had to say about that:</p>
<p>Needham's Charlie Wolf:  <em>Not every quarter is a blowout.</em> "The slowdown in iPhone sales in the second half of the September quarter in advance of the launch of iPhone 4S appeared to take some <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/19/apples-big-miss-the-analysts-weigh-in/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=71852&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/19/apples-big-miss-the-analysts-weigh-in/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The analysts on Apple&#8217;s iBlip: A &#8216;hiccup,&#8217; a &#8216;black swan,&#8217; a &#8216;breather at altitude&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q1Gp5DNL2PQ/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Q1Gp5DNL2PQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 4s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=71852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most shrug it off as a transitional aberration. Several raised their price targets.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Apple's (AAPL) fourth quarter results were the first since at least 2004 that failed to beat the analysts' consensus. A sampling of what they had to say about that:</p>
<p>Needham's Charlie Wolf:  <em>Not every quarter is a blowout.</em> "The slowdown in iPhone sales in the second half of the September quarter in advance of the launch of iPhone 4S appeared to take <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/19/apples-big-miss-the-analysts-weigh-in/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=71852&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/19/apples-big-miss-the-analysts-weigh-in/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple to announce fourth quarter results on Oct. 18</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/U0_Mym-Ou0g/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/U0_Mym-Ou0g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=69681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Click here at 5 p.m. Eastern (2 p.m. Pacific) for Apple's (AAPL) webcast of the conference call with analysts.
Thanks to setteb.it's Fabio M. Zambelli for the tip.
Filed under: Apple 2.0         ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-to-announce-fourth-quarter-results-on-oct-18/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Wall Street: Six quarters of lousy estimates</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fastest-Growing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=69630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For as long as we have been tracking them, the bloggers have trounced the pros</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Sources: Thomson Financial, Apple 2.0, company reports </p>
<p>On Sunday, the day after Apple's (AAPL) fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 ended, we posted preliminary revenue and EPS estimates from both Wall Street's Apple analysts and a group of amateurs we've been tracking for a couple of years.</p>
<p>After we posted the chart, one reader who calls himself <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=69630&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Wall Street: Six quarters of lousy estimates</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fastest-Growing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=69630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For as long as we have been tracking them, the bloggers have trounced the pros</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Source: Company reports, Thomson Financial, Apple 2.0</p>
<p>On Sunday, the day after Apple's (AAPL) fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 ended, we posted preliminary revenue and EPS estimates from both Wall Street's Apple analysts and a group of amateurs we've been tracking for a couple of years.</p>
<p>After we posted the chart, one reader who calls himself jmmxx <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=69630&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Wall Street: Six quarters of lousy estimates</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/Tj2eo7GBn-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fastest-Growing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=69630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For as long as we have been tracking them, the bloggers have trounced the pros</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Source: Company reports, Thomson Financial, Apple 2.0</p>
<p>On Sunday, the day after Apple's (AAPL) fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 ended, we posted preliminary revenue and EPS estimates from both Wall Street's Apple analysts and a group of amateurs we've been tracking for a couple of years.</p>
<p>After we posted the chart, one reader who calls himself jmmxx <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=69630&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/26/apple-and-wall-street-six-quarters-of-lousy-estimates/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Q4 2011: A tale of three wildly different estimates</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/yACWqvESdX8/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/yACWqvESdX8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPS. Earnings smackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fastest-Growing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Financial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=69593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Between the company, the Street and the amateur analysts, a range of $9.4 billion</p>
<p>Click to enlarge. Data: Company reports, Thomson Financial, Apple 2.0</p>
<p>Apple's (AAPL) fourth fiscal quarter of 2011 ended Saturday, and depending whose estimates you believe, it was either a ho-hum quarter or a record-smasher.</p>
<p>The chart at right shows the actual revenue and earnings per share for the previous 11 quarters -- Q1 2009 through Q3 2011. In <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/25/apples-q4-2011-a-tale-of-three-wildly-different-estimates/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=69593&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/25/apples-q4-2011-a-tale-of-three-wildly-different-estimates/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysts scramble to raise their iPhone and iPad estimates</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/NvXvvwN6u7c/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/NvXvvwN6u7c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=68527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hasty revisions three weeks before the end of Apple's last fiscal quarter of the year</p>
<p>It happens every three months. As the end of Apple's (AAPL) fiscal quarter approaches, the small army of analysts that cover the stock dusts off its spreadsheets, finds them overly conservative and starts issuing revisions. If history is any guide, the numbers will be revised again -- upward -- when the company reports its Q4 2011 <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/09/analysts-scramble-to-raise-their-iphone-and-ipad-estimates/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=68527&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/09/analysts-scramble-to-raise-their-iphone-and-ipad-estimates/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Downgrade Apple from &#8216;neutral&#8217; to &#8216;unfavorable&#8217;? Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/UIQvWjKyhWY/</link>
		<comments>http://rss.cnn.com/~r/fortuneapple20/~3/UIQvWjKyhWY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0 (Fortune)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/?p=67225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If anyone has access to Channel Trend's latest report on Apple, I would love to see it (Update: Got it!)</p>
<p>Source: Channel Trend</p>
<p>On Saturday night, this headline flashed across one of the news feeds I use to follow the analysts who track Apple (AAPL):</p>
<p>"On August 20, 2011 Channel Trend Inc. downgraded APPLE INC.from NEUTRAL to UNFAVORABLE."</p>
<p>My first thought was "seriously?" My second was "tell me more."</p>
<p>I've seen some boneheaded advice <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/08/21/downgrade-apple-from-neutral-to-unfavorable-seriously/">MORE</a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=tech.fortune.cnn.com&#38;blog=8466345&#38;post=67225&#38;subd=fortunebrainstormtech&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/08/21/downgrade-apple-from-neutral-to-unfavorable-seriously/feed/atom/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

